rank
by: oh
Aphi - it's obvious
Adpi
DZ -which may not last long
SDT
SK
ZTA
Chi O
Phi Sig - they are gettig better
AXiD
Kappa Delta - they are new to uri and not the prettiest but they have potential
#1by: Agree...
Commentby: Bp
Every middle to low tier house has pretty and more average girls....to be honest, the "top tier" houses have girls who are only really pretty by comparison to the people around them. KD and ChiO both have cute girls, look at their fb/twitter/instagrams.
- 0
- 0
by: ?
Dz not lasting long because without a social life, there's no reason for a house to remain on campus? Or am I missing something...
- 0
- 0
by: well
by: drama
by: G
by: ehhh
by: p
by: ehhh
idk, the posters didn't really specify whether it was based on looks or other traits...just that the girls seemed bland
- 0
- 0
by: .....
Not saying KD girls aren't pretty......but as someone mentioned earlier, compared to extraordinarily pretty girls
- 0
- 0
by: RW<3
by: uh...
I don't think it makes you lower than whoever "you" is, but I think if confidence was their main thing, then from previous comments, they chose girls who weren't as confidant as others who were not selected. It seems the girls who weren't selected were confident in themselves. Lacking confidence isn't something that belittles someone. But it is interesting to choose girls who aren't as confident to establish a chapter. Generally sororities don't look for girls to make them confident, rather find girls who are confident and are willing to spread confidence.
- 0
- 0
by: uh...
I'm not saying they picked people who aren't confident i'm saying they're not going to destroy confidence by denying you if you aren't the "ideal" looking girl.
- 0
- 0
by: ?
You're gonna criticize someone for "not being confident enough" on a thread filled with posts about how their nations clearly weren't making looks a priority? Way to demonstrate greek fellowship and basic feminist support for your fellow women.
- 0
- 0
by: wht.
#10by: For Realz
I don't understand why everyone is so worked up about not wanting to own up to their stereotypes. Stereotypes are generated from a facet of truth. Therefore if you are the pretty sorority, the less attractice sorority, the most intelligent (in terms of house GPA), or the awkward house, there is a basis of truth. Alpha Phi and ADPi are considered "top" sororities because they've wanted that spot. They specifically look for the pretty girls, and have good philanthropy and sisterhood. If you are bottom tier, then perhaps there is a facet of truth to that as well. I mean, if you look around, and notice that you are missing what "top tier" houses have, then work together collectively to move up. Or if you don't care, and you love your sorority for what you are, then good for you guys. But coming on here and bashing each other is highly immature. And tbh, I highly doubt it's top tier sororities that are doing it, they don't have to prove themselves, they already did. I think it's most likely mid-bottom tier sororities trying to one up each other.
Post Reply
Before you type: Please do not post individual names, defaming content, or spam. Remember, cyber bullying can be considered a crime.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Didn't find your school?Request for your school to be featured on GreekRank.
by: lol
If prettiness is the main factor Phi Sig belongs in the bottom lmao
- 0
- 0
Report