Grades after you pledge

top five in grades are AGD, AXO, XO, KD and Phi Mu - all of them have a very social calendar and take top pnms so making a 3.5 isn't a hard activity for them to handle on top of everything else that is required. \n\n\n\n\n1. (3.90 - 3.86) AGD
2. (3.85 - 3.81)
3. (3.80 - 3.76) AXO
4. (3.75 - 3.71) XO
5. (3.70 - 3.66)
6. (3.65 - 3.61) PM, KD
7. (3.60 - 3.56) PIPHI
8. (3.55 - 3.51) DDD, ZTA
9. (3.50 - 3.46) ADPI, KKG, DG, DZ

those top 8 in grades (+ kkg) also have the highest membership numbers. none of those houses disaffiliates members due to lower grades like someone said.

Harsh but the best response. True true.

OR grannie, women can have TTs and IGs AND still be accomplished. U r sooooo judgmental and cringy. Going to NOLA doesn’t mean u will fail out. The problem w the “high achieving, grade oriented” sororities is that they all have this awful attitude. If u want OR grannies dictating how u need to act during college, join one of these sororities BUT they r many amazing houses that also make women into successful leaders wo being judgemental. BFR, u aren’t a student at Bama and u haven’t been for a long time.

@ICU

I graduated last year. If you went to school here you would know that NO house wants a middle school-mentality member who can't write or spell.

All houses have rules, commitments, and standards. You can party hard and post all the cringy tts you want but you don't need a sorority for that. They don't need you either.

@ICU

You are obviously the OP and posting bs about houses you know nothing about. You don't go to school here since you are judging houses based on their accomplishments and bs you read on gr.

Your reading comprehension is also very poor, since you are commenting on things I didn't even say. You are no Kylan. She is an exception.

Work on your basic skills now so you can do something other than post on GR in the future. Maybe you could get into a CC.

@ohbut, u r so wrong, not op just think ur comments r crass.

What judgments on houses did I make? And please be specific. All said is that OR alums r judgemental. U proved my point. U an OR alum and u r being judgemental & trying to dictate how women should act.

What things did I misinterpret? Please be specific.

U r absolutely bashing other women. U said high achieving women r social but don’t engage in “cringe TT and sus IG”. Why u care? then u said the “ cretins who troll this site define social as being seen most often drunk and sleeping with frat boys in NOLA. They’ll fail out, leave school, live at home while still trying to make it on TT, and be forgotten”. So the “cretins” u r referring to r women in Greek life. U r absolutely bashing women and insinuating that if a woman goes to Nola they will fail out. NOT TRUE. Women can be on TT, go to Nola and be successful. U r absolutely trying to talk up ur academic house while bashing other women and their choices.

Ur ability to defend urself is weak at best as u speak in generalization wo be specific.

Also since when is CC used as an insult? It’s a good option for a lot of ppl that need to save $. Just another example of ur judgemental attitude. Not a nice bone in ur body.

I can say at least I go here, u can’t say the same. Also if I’m so uneducated what does it say about u? We got into the same school 😘

Why so defensive ICU? Obviously someone hit a nerve and you recognized yourself in the comments.

You can't come at someone about bashing women when you just bashed a couple thousand of them with "The problem w the “high achieving, grade oriented” sororities is that they all have this awful attitude."

I have every right to point out nasty comments and attitudes from “high achieving” houses. It’s great that u value high achievement BUT u shouldn’t put down other women to make urself look great. That is what the comment did. I’m not defensive just calling out bad behavior

@yup, you are just as guilty. Peruse through the previous threads and you’ll see just as many derogatory comments directed towards the houses you claim have “awful attitudes” as those you claim to be defending. How about both of you stop. This thread is ridiculous and no one is achieving anything other than looking childish.

I called it an “awful attitude” bc that is the behavior that was demonstrated and observed in the post. I didn’t make all those other derogatory comments towards high achieving houses. That has nothing to do w me. Using those comments as a justification for putting down women for TT and Nola is not okay. It’s childish. I was calling out the posters bad attitude towards women. She was building up her house while putting other women down. It’s not okay and u shouldn’t be okay w it. All of us should be building each other up.

I agree w u. High achieving houses r bashed as well and it isn’t fair. Honestly, valuing good grades is a great quality. I commented bc in defending high achieving houses the post was also derogatory towards women. Women can do IG, TT and Nola and still get good grades. It’s great for the post to discuss the pros of being in a high achieving house BUT putting down others to make urself look good is not cool. That is where I was coming from.

The OP just gave advice. She said be aware of sorority grade requirements and make sure u will be able to do it. It’s good advice but it’s seemed to have triggered a lot ppl. The OP isn’t even rude but a lot of the comments r very judgmental. Calm down and allow ppl to choose the place that is right for them. There is no need to belittle or criticize

Yes and the first responses the to the OP just say that for the girls in the houses with more stringent academic requirements, it won’t be an issue because the first round cuts for those houses are grade based so girls that won’t make the cut academically won’t even have those options available to them anyway. Basically it’s an unnecessary post since the first round cuts eliminate the issue.

A subtle attempt at bashing a house is still bashing. Posting to “beware” because of academic requirements at 2 of the top houses is unnecessary. As previously stated, the girls in the houses referenced have no problem balancing grades with fun. Try another tactic.

So, for future reference, it’s ok to bash the houses that include academics as part of the recruitment process (at a University I might add) and not ok to say anything about those houses that are primarily social focused. Cool. Got it.

sounds like someone hit a nerve with a gr troll who lives with their parents tryin to make it on tiktok

@notetoself, for someone that is in a supposedly academic house, I don’t understand how u don’t get it. The word “beware” is not the same nor does it justify the over the top response w disgusting language from “high achieving” houses. U can and should defend urself but leave out all the disgusting language. Stop justifying and supporting that type of behavior.

Which houses, at what GPA, prevent you from participating in functions? Since you know