all i'm saying issss...
by: Nah
ADPI DDD KD ZTA - Top
AXO XO - Upper Middle
Phi Mu KKG DZ - Lower Middle
AGD Pi Phi Gamma Phi - Bottom
yall really shouldn't argue so much "top" vs "upper middle" is just tradition. My fraternity likes AXO and XO better than some of the top sororities but they still don't have the same tradition, that isn't something that is going to happen over the course of one, two or even four or five years.
Comment#2 by: confused
This makes plenty of sense. And emphasizes that tiers are opinion. Would definitely agree with you about the overargued "top" vs "upper middle" However confused as to your definition of tradition.
USC Founding dates (alphabetical by year):
1928- ADPi, XO, DDD, DZ
1929-ZTA
1940- KD
1967- KKG
1988- AXO
2005-GPHI
2009- Phi Mu
2012- AGD
2014- Pi Phi
So shouldn't DZ and KKG have more tradition too?
Post Reply
Before you type: Remember, do not post names, initials, or any derogatory content.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
POPULAR
Didn't find your school?Request for your school to be featured on GreekRank.
by: NoJan 8, 2015 11:32:39 PM
No because traditionally the girls that are in those sororities aren't good and thus they don't have a rich history of powerful/important/influential alumni like DDD/KD/ZTA/ADPI.
First off they aren't all southern like KD/DDD/ADPi so they don't have as much alumni/pull in the area. If 30 years from now AXO is still as good as they are now, then MAYBE they will be a top tier. But just because they get some hot pledge classes doesn't make them top tier. Not what it's about.
- 0
- 0
Report