down with iusf, boycott little 5
by: ...
stand with DSP, AXiD, and Chi O, boycott little 5
total BS what IUF and IUSF did to them
search IDS Delta Sigma Pi, Alpha Xi Delta Coach penalized for Little 500
#1 by: hmmmm
I read the article and I do have a couple of questions. Can anyone out there address these?
1.How can an adult man not know that recording a conversation without consent is not ethical? He did not record it, granted, but he did pass it along knowing it was unethical. I am not condoning IUSF behavior in any way, believe me. But two wrongs do not make a right.
2. IUSF, how can you pick and choose which "rules" you want to enforce? You should have allowed the rider to ride for DSP. It's your mistake, suck it up and then put the rule in the book for next year.
3. What is with the IDS not publishing the name of the first team the rider listed on her application? What are they teaching at the Media School? I do believe that the name of the team is relevant, could it be a team which is not as competitive as DSP? I think this is shoddy reporting by the IDS.
4. Who is responsible for the ultimate oversight of IUSF? Is there another means of appeal available?
Post Reply
Before you type: Remember, do not post names, initials, or any derogatory content.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
POPULAR
Didn't find your school?Request for your school to be featured on GreekRank.
by: WellApr 9, 2019 10:01:08 PM
1. Indiana is a one sided consent state when it comes to recording. Period. That is state law. You are free to record any conversation you are a participant in. Its not unethical at all. It ensures that commitment made verbally are established and clear. That way, people can't reneg on a deal.
2. Agreed. If it isn't in the rule book, it isn't a rule. I have the same issue with the IU Code of Rights and Responsibilities when it comes to Greek life. Rules must be written.
3. Yeah, this is odd.
4. Perhaps appeals should be able to be made to Rider's Council....Would seem to make more sense