I v The Supreme Court of The United Stated of America

This action is brought not in confusion or desperation, but in defiance—because the truth has waited long enough. What occurred was not a misunderstanding, not a bureaucratic oversight, and not a policy failure. It was a deliberate, torturous, and extrajudicial attempt to execute a civilian inside their own home—an act carried out under the direction or protection of the United States intelligence community. The purpose was as unlawful as the method: to coerce intelligence that did not exist, to extract information that could be twisted or manufactured for treasonous ends. The target was not a criminal, not a threat, but an unwitting citizen exploited as an asset without consent or awareness, and then marked for elimination when no utility could be extracted. When the operation failed, the cover-up began—systemic, ruthless, and carefully maintained across agencies. Every path to redress was blocked. Every institution that could have intervened chose silence instead. The suffering inflicted was not collateral damage; it was the point. This complaint exists to expose that truth—every agonizing second of it—and to confront, in legal terms, a coordinated attempt to annihilate a life not for justice or security, but for secrecy, manipulation, and control.