If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
Yall

<strong>Subject:</strong><br />completely agree with below <br /><br /> Poster Message:
Yall the only accurate post I've even seen on this website is the one below where he/she said that these rankings are made up and fueled strictly by freshman and high school seniors. There are no "tiers" or "ranks". There are good fraternities and there are irrelevant fraternities. All the houses in the village are good/relevant, Beta/PhiSig just don't have their own houses so their presence isn't as dominant/permanent/serious. For every 1 fraternity guy there is 4 sorority girls, the odds are in your favor no matter what fraternity you're in. Again with 350 girls in each sorority A) Acting like you can actually stereotype and rank them accurately is 100% BS B) Even if their were ranks there's like 4 times as many girls in a sorority than there are guys in a fraternity. If there were really ranks that'd mean that the top 4 sororities would have enough girls that every fraternity on campus could only have top tier girls at their place if they all had parties the same night. Clearly it doesn't work that way. People hang out with who they hang out with. Goodlooking and charming people tend to have goodlooking/charming friends. Maybe some fraternities have a few more studs and some sororities have a few less classy girls but by and large all our GLO's are great and hang out with one another equally.