If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
Honest

<strong>Subject:</strong><br />old rankings???<br /><br /> Poster Message:
Honestly, if there's one thing I've realized on GR, it's that everyone is obsessed with old rankings. By this, I mean that people on here will deny certain houses are moving up and certain houses are moving down. For example, Gamma Phi has long been socializing with middle tier frats and pulling good girls. So, why are so many people continuously putting them in the bottom tier? On the same note, while Alpha Gam has just recently shown improvement, they've risen quickly and are now also socializing with the middle tier too. Also, their past few pledge classes are very solid. Bottom tier sororities don't have the same caliber of girls or social calendars as these two, so why are they lumped into bottom with those houses? Also, sigma kappa is continuously considered middle tier when their social calendar rivals the new row top tier. They're well known on campus for having beautiful girls, and are very obviously recruiting better than the rest of the middle tier. So why on earth are they still considered just average? On the other hand, Chi O is an "old row" sorority that has had multiple years of bad pledge classes and has a social calendar similar to that of the bottom tier. So why do we consider them top tier still? All I'm saying is that holding onto old reputations is ridiculous. Frats have obviously realized the changes in the sororities mentioned because their social calendars have changed. Thoughts? Anymore examples?