If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
alum

<strong>Subject:</strong><br />calm down, ladies<br /><br /> Poster Message:
I was fortunate enough to be involved with recruitment this year and have friends who helped in almost all of the other houses. Some I already knew, some I just recently met. My daughter told me about this site and thought I would find it funny. It's definitely funny but it's also disturbing because of the inaccurate information. I read that one house that always does well had a 40% return rate. That's false. I read that one house that always recruits well didn't have to make any cuts this year. That's false. I read that one house that has had its struggles in the past only got 20 new members. That's false (they made quota). I read that people purported to walk around yesterday and rate the new members from what they observed on the lawns. That's a ridiculous proposition. Do you know what's the truth? As far as we can tell, all of these "rankings" have been written by the worst kind of sorority women. Actives and new members did not write them. These were written by mean girls who grew up to be mean women. You want to know what else is true? All the chapters at OU made quota and hundreds of new members are ecstatic about their new homes. True. All chapters got girls that they wanted and that wanted them. True No chapter got all the girls they wanted. True No chapter got all the "top" girls according to their criteria. True All the ranking you see on here is biased and therefore false. Truth. So how about you ladies go back to gossiping in person about all the girls that hated your enemy's house and loved your house and leave the OU campus alone. We're doing fine, Oklahoma! Boomer!