If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
sc

Poster Message:
I am confused why the national didn't aggressively work with the local to root out the source of the issues in terms of specific individuals being terminated. I think it was at FL a few years ago that a national worked with a local house to terminate 10 members that they believed contributed to the risk mgmt issues that were a source of concern. The house then stayed on probation for another year and then was off of probation and hasn't had issues since. I haven't heard that anything like that happened here. I believe the issues were serious to close the house but not so sure the leadership from national was proactive and strong enough to resolve the situation such that the house didn't have to close. I heard from a friend at Mizzou that the Sig Ep situation there was somewhat similar in that the national tried a few things for a year to address risk issues but that they threw in the towel once the trust was broken too many times. My friend thought that if the exec leadership had been turned over and a few cliques removed from the house that things perhaps could have been changed. It's always a difficult call on how to change a house culture but closing a house seems quite drastic.