If deemed necessary, reported comments will be removed within 7 - 10 days but usually sooner. Please submit this report ONLY if you STRONGLY believe this needs to be removed. Multiple illegitimate reports slow down the administrative process of removing the actual and more seriously unfavorable content.

Poster Name:
PHA

Poster Message:
Houses are required to cut a certain % of girls (with a little wiggle room) based on the last 3 years of recruitment data. More competitive houses must cut more PNMs and less competitive/new houses cut less. There are also some house-specific requirements that are private. The idea is to for each house to have the best chance to reach quota, not to be exclusive for the sake of being exclusive. So if those three houses have been becoming more competitive, then yes, they would be making larger cuts than past years. No idea if it's true, but it's not something to worry about. Like a previous poster said, more women are going through recruitment and less women are dropping out, meaning bigger pledge classes for everyone (assuming a lot of PNMs don't drop to try to join KKG at the last minute). But the percentage each house cuts would be the same.